Thursday 14 July 2011

A Brief History of Drug Testing

Drug testing is big business. With at least fifteen large U.S. companies by providing laboratory testing, employees and others just a short journey to the center of the test. Employers with drug testing as a tool for pre-employment assessment for parents who want to observe the welfare of young people, there are many groups that frequently use drug testing as a screening tool.
 

Since mid-1980 has spread more drug tests. Possible to test the most common group of employees with potential. With strict regulations on safety and the fact that people use dangerous equipment or access to confidential information, employers want to know that their employees are not drug addicts. With a sample of urine, hair, blood, or swabs of the mouth, frequent drug testing laboratory has a positive or negative results up to 24 to 48 hours.
 

More recently, evidence of drug abuse has become more common in professional sports. With the controversy surrounding the use of steroids and other performance enhancing substances athletes in the overall discussion. The Government also took over and started to implement stricter controls and more frequent screening of athletes. A positive result in a drug test could result in penalties such as fines, loss of playing time, or set the device. It is safe to say that athletes depend on big risks with their careers by abusing performance or other illicit drugs.
 

Fighting drug testing argue that it violates privacy rights. They argue that even if workers are drug users do not necessarily follow that their work will be affected. With the increasing popularity of random drug testing in the workforce, which can be pulled right out of the hat to come for screening drugs. Although the state does not enforce the drug laws without proof, opponents say that random drug testing may damage a person's life. In fact, the use of free time on weekends can lead to loss of employment if the drug is determined by the test drug. Random drug testing is often argued that testing without reasonable cause.

No comments:

Post a Comment